Why no rec.games.pbEm? From: Simon Reed <simon@sandj.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000 I'm sure someone has raised this question before but it appears in no FAQ I have seen. I am *not* interested in PBM, only PBeM. IMHO it would be convenient to have a rec.games.pbem as well as rec.games.pbm a) has this been attempted before? b) is there a good reason (besides the usual "too many newsgroups already") why there this should not be done? c) am I being unreasonable? I appreciat a number of games allow/require turns to be sent in by post or email, where they would live I do not know! -- Simon Reed, simon@sandj.demon.co.uk Referenced By Up