Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild

From: Rich <ricmal@delphi.com>

Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000

David G. Saville <dsaville@unm.edu> writes:

>roleplayers.  Long ago, when the DM folks were still here, we went
>back and forth on the subject of newsletters.  DM's newsletter

The reason most of the dm players aren't here is they have established their
own round table.
But they lurk, believe me they lurk.

>things, DM has very little to no development.  I do not blame
>RSI for this....they have quite a large player base and until
>attrition starts to hurt the bottom line they have no incentive

Actually the biggest reason RSI hasn't made further development on DM is
because there is really no need for it.  If players enjoy the game as is, why
change it?   I have played both.  I like both AG and DM for their own merits.
But tocmpare one to the ot
her is like apples to oranges.  One isn't the other.  If you don'tlike apples
you don't have to eat them, samefor oranges.  If youlike both, enjoy each for
their own distinct flavors.  I will be the first to tell you DM has its
problems, whatgame really do
esn't?  Dm is an older game, designedin a differnet time and  the PBM world has
evolved with computer technology.  To do a major overhaul of DM to make it like
AG would in essence "spoil" DM and it would no longer be DM.

References

Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild
dconklin@netcom.com (Douglas D. Conklin)
Sun, 21 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild
dag@chem.ucla.edu (Great Cthulhu)
Mon, 22 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild
baw@grebble.oau.org (Brett Wampner)
Tue, 23 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild
Rich <ricmal@delphi.com>
Thu, 25 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Duelmasters VS Adventurer's Guild
dsaville@unm.edu (David G. Saville)
Sat, 27 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000