Re: AG: A new topic!

From: dsaville@unm.edu (David G. Saville)

Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0000

In article <Pine.OSF.3.91.950629170411.5757B-100000@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu>,
sean  <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu> wrote:
>
>I would like to find out everyones opinion on the 'Top adventures list'.
>Why is it that even when a character dies he/she can STILL make that
>list?  I consider death a fairly bad thing.  Why should a character still
>make the list if they die?  Personaly, I think that if you die you should
>not be included on that list.  Anyone else???

Its already been changed to top surviving characters.

>
>P.S.-  By the way...  Ever notice that the top adventurer list is nearly
>always composed of high power characters? :)  Thought you might like this
>Mike, Al, and Dave!! :)

That's by design.  I believe it was set up as a way to make
adventuring as economical (real money) to staying in the guild.
The characters who make the list would undoubtably get at least
one, more likely more credits in the guild for being the best
in several areas.  And, objective standards, high level characters
are better adventurers.

Dave
(one of those evil longterm managers)

>
>

References

AG: A new topic!
sean <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu>
Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

AG: A new topic!
sean <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu>
Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0000