Re: ME-PBM Late Joiners

From: dubberly@bach (John Dubberly)

Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0000

Doug Bonar (bonar@math.rutgers.edu) wrote:

: 	One posting in this thread implied that a neutral contry
: can join either the good or evil side without their having any
: say in the matter.  If that is the case, that looks like a problem
: in the rules.  (And incidentally, fixing it would 'fix' the play

From the above statement it is obvious that you have never read the
rules, so you too don't play the game. Figures that the two who are so
for this play style don't even know why we hate it. As a word to the
wise, know something in the future before you speak.

: you don't like too.)  But why don't you consider sitting and building
: forces if no-one is attacking a valid strategy?  Would you think
: more highly of it if it was done by one of the free people?  Soeone
: on the dark side?

Anyone building up quietly and not helping his team is an asset to
his enemies and a loss to the team. In ME-PBM not aiding your allies
is a quick way to have none. Many a game I have worked with my true
allies to eviscerate members of the team that did not help or left
the loners out to dry once they were brought into the fight.

-john dubberley

References

Re: ME-PBM Late Joiners
desj@ccr-p.ida.org (David desJardins)
Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: ME-PBM Late Joiners
dcd@nasa.kodak.com (Dennis DeYoung)
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: ME-PBM Late Joiners
bonar@math.rutgers.edu (Doug Bonar)
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0000