Re: Galaxy: Suggestion: test idea re bombing planets?

From: markhof@ls12r.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Ingolf Markhof)

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0000

In article <809908393snz@sandj.demon.co.uk>, Simon Reed
<simon@sandj.demon.co.uk> writes:

Well, I thinks this is a rather bad idea. In fact, I'd prefer to change
the game the other way round: It should be possible just to conquer an
enemy planet instead of bombing it. I you could retain the production
capability of such a planet, attacking would pay off much earlier in the
game.

|> Finally: quick question to all present and past Galaxy players: are
|> the rules too complex or too simple?  (If too complex I'll shut up,
|> iff too simple - I've got loads more ideas!)

It depends on how you define "complexity". From the point of stragtegy,
galaxy is rather simple and it could be for sure enhanced by some
more options. But technically, galaxy is too complex already. Too much
fomulas, to much calculation.

References

Galaxy: Suggestion: test idea re bombing planets?
Simon Reed <simon@sandj.demon.co.uk>
Thu, 31 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Galaxy: Suggestion: test idea re bombing planets?
Simon Reed <simon@sandj.demon.co.uk>
Thu, 31 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0000