Re: AG: Temple Raid

From: khearn@pyramid.com (Keith Hearn)

Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000

In article <49ffql$ig4@steel.interlog.com>,
Shai'taan  <shaitan@interlog.com> wrote:
>sean <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, Shai'taan wrote:
>> > Temple was bare, you'd have walked away EXTREMELY wealthy on
>> > a successful raid, because when you add gems, plate mail, and other stuff,
>> > well, that's a tremendous amount!!
>> I do not think you get their armor.  Takes too much time to get it off.
>> Not sure, but I thought I had heard Hugh mention this.
>> 	Sean
>
>Well they sure as hell got MINE!!  Those evil Wokrob guys threw me
>out in the gutter with nothing but my underwear!  You're probably
>right, though:  armour, etc.. while expensive, isn't really regarded
>as treasure per se.,  Maybe if you bring a Fostils w/ you....
>
>Better be sure of winning, I guess!!!
>

I'd guess that the reason they got your armor was that you were raiding
  them. Once they had subdued you, they had all night to strip you of
  anything you had.

I'd guess that if you'd won, you'd have had to grab what you could get
  quickly and run, before reinforcements or the town guard showed up.

So does this imply that defending a temple will get you more gear
  from the attackers, but attacking a temple will get you more cash
  from the temple? Beats me, but it sounds reasonable.

Keith Hearn
    Marcellus & Kirin in Barstow

References

AG: Temple Raid
Todd Woods <woods@cs.uiowa.edu>
Sun, 26 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: AG: Temple Raid
sean <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu>
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: AG: Temple Raid
Shai'taan <shaitan@interlog.com>
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

AG: Temple Raid
Todd Woods <woods@cs.uiowa.edu>
Sun, 26 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: AG: Temple Raid
sean <sean@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu>
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: AG: Temple Raid
Shai'taan <shaitan@interlog.com>
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0000