Re: Player Ethics, e.g. Olympia

From: lindahl@deshaw.com (Greg Lindahl)

Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000

In article <4j1dkc$70s@hawk.pix.za>, Jaxon Rice <jaxon@pixie.co.za> wrote:

>As a new player in Olympia (only joined on turn 86) I still feel that
>Olympia has something to offer . The main reason for this is its
>infinite resources.

Sure, you can build. But with the Faery Superhighway, anyone who
dislikes you can wipe you out. So I'd advise not threatening the AOO.

> Everything has not been discovered yet and in the
>case of further AOO members dropping out , there will soon be no more
>AOO .

Neah, a few of them will stay in, and it only takes one stack of 400
dragons moving through Faery to make your day.

BTW, for those who think the AOO didn't agressively attack their
enemies, they did. Both MAFOC and some allies of mine on Rimmon got
chased down by the AOO, and the West Camaris folks got their
high-level mage snatched by an AOO raiding party. The anti-AOO folks
were definately both disorganized and out-played.

>As to Mark's proposal I think it is a great idea . Perhaps Rich would
>let a few players to play 'character' positions for free. It would
>certainly add to the game play .Perhaps former members of the AOO
>could do this in game 2. They know the system and it would be a just
>reward for all the work that they put into game 1.YOu don't have to
>like the AOO but they certainly knew how to crush the opposition.

I think there won't be a shortage of "bad guys" in G2.

-- Oleg

References

Re: Player Ethics, e.g. Olympia
wbruvold@weber.ucsd.edu (William Bruvold)
Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Player Ethics, e.g. Olympia
jaxon@pixie.co.za (Jaxon Rice)
Sat, 23 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Player Ethics, e.g. Olympia
wbruvold@weber.ucsd.edu (William Bruvold)
Wed, 20 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Player Ethics, e.g. Olympia
jaxon@pixie.co.za (Jaxon Rice)
Sat, 23 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0000