Re: Ads on rec.games.pbm, The Real Post

From: dlepriol@iac.co.jp

Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks) writes:
>
> > I don't mean to beat the straw out of you <G>. But you're basically
> > telling anyone who wants to learn about new games or advertise a new game
> > to go somewhere else (just like I described in my metaphor above). They
> > don't have to, so why don't you drop it?
>
> No, I didn't say that. In fact, I encourage new games to post one
> announcement here.
>
> > Informative ads on Usenet can only help. Nobody's condoning "repetitive"
> > postings.
>
> One of the items under discussion is monthly ads for all games. If you
> think they'll all be totally rewritten every month, you're deluded.
>
> -- g
--------------------------
	my own two cents :

Suppose someone just want to know about pbm/pbem games and just peep in,
but do not lurk around regularily. He may just miss the kind of game
he/she likes. Doesn't makes much sense to me.

After close to a year lurking here, I cannot say this ng is swamped by
abusive ads.

an ex-lurker, who doesn't what this hell is all about

References

Re: Ads on rec.games.pbm, The Real Post
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Ads on rec.games.pbm, The Real Post
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Ads on rec.games.pbm, The Real Post
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Ads on rec.games.pbm, The Real Post
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0000