Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision

From: graeme@discreet.co.uk (Graeme Griffiths)

Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

In <19970724072101.DAA26998@ladder01.news.aol.com> kmgraphiks@aol.com
    (KMGraphiks) writes:

>You're sidestepping again. The CFD is about changing the FAQ not
>chartering this newsgroup. The fact that you put your own personal
>condition on when you would change your FAQ does not mean we accept it.

No Ken, you're side-stepping. That the group could adopt a charter is one of
the things you could discuss. Some people may not consider it a positive
step, some might. Thats why you discuss before you vote. I could have just
posted a call for votes on chartering the group and everyone would have said
"Huh ?" because nobody suggested it as a vote.

Why not take some time, back off, think about what the problem is, and see
if you can see a solution. Then post an article with your suggestion. This
would be a positive thing to do rather than simply sniping at Greg every
time he posts which is not only wearing but the very thing that turned this
(important) issue into a flame-war in the first place.

--
Graeme Griffiths - Discreet Logic (Newbury, UK)
Disclaimer: I do not speak for anyone but myself and I do that badly.
Mail: graeme@discreet.co.uk
Spam: All unsolicited mail will be reported, and billed for my time.

References

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000