Re: R e : PROPOSAL: A solution to the tired and stupid FAQ thread

From: Phil Shulkind <phil@phildee.demon.co.uk>

Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

KMGraphiks <kmgraphiks@aol.com> writes
>
>Your post oddly comes right at the time when the argument is at it's
>all-time slowest.

You can't mean in terms of postings surely? I'm skimming through 30-40
of these tiresome messages a day now, it seems to be increasing if
anything, and I just wonder why the hell it's still going on!

What impression do you think you are giving to people dropping into this
newsgroup for the first time? Even if only one person is put off PBM by
this constant argument, that's one person too many! Can't you all just
stop and think about the effect you're having, then take it to email -
please. Maybe someone should set up a mailing list so that you can argue
in private and let us all know when you've finally agreed on something
(which will of course never happen, too many egos involved!).

How many people does it take to plead with you all to leave it alone
before you finally see the light???!!!

Phil Shulkind
PHILDEE ENTERPRISES
Professional Play By Mail since 1990
*NEW* web site : http://www.phildee.demon.co.uk

References

PROPOSAL: A solution to the tired and stupid FAQ thread
godot22@earthlink.net (PJ Killian)
Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
R e : PROPOSAL: A solution to the tired and stupid FAQ thread
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

PROPOSAL: A solution to the tired and stupid FAQ thread
godot22@earthlink.net (PJ Killian)
Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
R e : PROPOSAL: A solution to the tired and stupid FAQ thread
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000