Re: The PBM Report

From: kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000

> I was looking forward to working with the PBM Report to produce this article.
>Instead the PBM Report wanted to print an article dealing w/ how unethical and
>unfair Grandel inc. is. All this was to be based on Grandel Inc.'s dealing w/
>US Flagship.

I can provide anyone a copy of my email to Bill. A reasonable person would not
come to the conclusion that I wanted to print an article dealing with how
unethical and unfair Grandel is.

>You still think Ken's being honest with you? He states having the letters
>printed in Flagship as proof, but he admitted to me in a letter that they were
>probably edited to make Grandel inc. look bad and Flagship look good.

The letters in Flagship are the best evidence-to-date. I stated in my email to
you that "I don't doubt the first letter may have been edited to make FS look
better. " Note that I said MAY HAVE. I don't know that it was, you haven't
given me proof that it was. I'm afraid I was mainly saying that to appease you
since I was as yet unaccustomed to your fervent posts.

>An "update" article on GP and Grandel Inc would be great! Only I think someone
>who is ethical and can be trusted to tell the whole story should write it. Not
>someone who is trying to create a scandal so he can keep his subscribers
>interested. Call me old fashioned, but I like my reporters to be fair and
>honest.

I'm afraid you would only talk to a reporter that would assure you that
everything in the article would be PRO game and PRO Grandel.

Ken Mitchell
Ken Mitchell Graphics
The PBM Report
http://www.tightbeam.com/pbm-report

References

Re: The PBM Report
maxnbr1@aol.com (MAXNBR1)
Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: The PBM Report
maxnbr1@aol.com (MAXNBR1)
Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000