The PBM Report

From: maxnbr1@aol.com (MAXNBR1)

Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000

>I think it's rather senseless to delve into the past and revive this
>'controversy'. Galactic Prisoners has been successfully run by Ed Grandel
>for over ten years. It's his game, and he can institute any policies he
>wants for its operation and for the conduct of its players. It seems now
>that he wants to be left alone. I don't think that's unreasonable...

My point exactly.  I know Grandel Inc doesn't want the review, I know the
players don't want the review, and I'm pretty sure, based on all the e-mail
I've received, That the PBM players don't want this printed either.  It's seems
like a desperate attempt to stir up controversy and old lies.  The truth is
always more interesting.  Why don't you print how and why one company was
singled out for persecution? Or is fiction better than fact?

Ken,
 I find it hard to believe that someone who is supposed to be reporting on PBM
news has never seen or heard of a game moderator or game company acting
unethically.

Bob,
 You were right, I did confuse my flagships.  I was referring to US Flagship,
not American Flagship. I was actually not aware that they were two seperate
entities.

Carol,
 Flagship has not had a sparkling past.  In the US it was never able to take
off.  Partly because of it's tarnished history.  Players went to Paper Mayhem
instead. They knew it was fair and ethical.

References

Re: The PBM Report
"Juggernaut Press" <pbm@gamesbymail.com>
Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: The PBM Report
"Juggernaut Press" <pbm@gamesbymail.com>
Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0000